Re: Linking in CW shared lib vs. Xcode framework
Re: Linking in CW shared lib vs. Xcode framework
- Subject: Re: Linking in CW shared lib vs. Xcode framework
- From: Syd Polk <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:12:12 -0500
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Jo Meder wrote:
Hi Fritz,
On 2/08/2006, at 11:24 AM, Fritz Anderson wrote:
There is a threshold issue here...
You're aware that Xcode can't produce CFM binaries?
Of course. I could have been clearer I guess, but I assumed most
people would assume that the Xcode side of things was Mach-O. Too
many assumptions, I apologise for that. I mentioned CFM because the
app built with Codewarrior is CFM and not Mach-O ( which it could
have been ), and I'm interested in the difference between what is
happening with the CW/CFM shared lib and the Xcode/Mach-O
framework. The reason the app is still CW/CFM after all this time
is that we still support OS 9 for it. I'm now looking into building
a Universal version for those with Intel machines, because our next
product, which is already Universal, has been delayed.
What symbols exactly are coming up missing? Without the build log,
this is incredibly difficult to diagnose.
Syd Polk
email@hidden
"Let the music be your light" - Dave Edwards, KUHF-FM, 1982
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden