• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3


  • Subject: Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3
  • From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:21:15 -0700


On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Brad Oliver wrote:

On Aug 26, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Jason Foreman wrote:


GCC uses AT&T syntax rather than Intel syntax.  So I think rather than


I was under the impression that when "CodeWarrior style" assembly is enabled, for x86 it instead uses Intel-style. Is that not true?


No, you're thinking of PPC asm.  For Intel-style assembly source, you need to enable nasm.

Chris
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3
      • From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3 (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3 (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3
  • Next by Date: Re: try/catch/throw/finally example?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3
  • Next by thread: Re: Intel syntax in Xcode 2.3
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread