• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?


  • Subject: Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?
  • From: "John C. Daub" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:44:10 -0600
  • Thread-topic: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?

on 2/6/06 10:26 AM, Gen Kiyooka at email@hidden wrote:

> The other factor to consider is that the 3 different dylib models
> that are
> available all have different life cycle models.  I wrote a series of
> test
> programs that explored the loading/unloading cycle for dynamic libs,
> frameworks and bundles and they have different unloading properties.

Hrm... I did not know this.

All that I saw did make me wonder what was going on in the runtime, what was
causing things to behave like they did. I still wonder if that's happening
and somehow playing subtle evil things.

> My suggestion is to hook the mach load/unload entry points and dump
> some stuff to the console log to make sure your frameworks are loading
> and unloading the way you expect them to.

I admit I don't know how to do this. Would you be so kind as to enlighten
me? :-)

--
John C. Daub }:-)>=
<mailto:email@hidden> <http://www.hsoi.com/>
"When there is no desire, all things are at peace." -- Tao Te Ching #30



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?
      • From: Gen Kiyooka <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4? (From: Gen Kiyooka <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: three small things
  • Next by Date: hand cursor (repost)
  • Previous by thread: Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?
  • Next by thread: Re: crash in __static_initialization_and_destruction on 10.3.9 but not 10.4.4?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread