• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Stack trace for i386 yet?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Stack trace for i386 yet?


  • Subject: Stack trace for i386 yet?
  • From: Andy Wiese <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:52:03 -0700

Is there a commonly known solution for constructing a backtrace for i386? With the tips generously provided by Rush Manbert on 2006/04/21, I tried using gcc __builtin_return_address, but just as the documentation implies, the results are wacky for anything but a very simple demo application. We have previously used the MoreBackTrace code from the MoreIsBetter library, but the most current word I can find in list archives is that Quinn has been working on an intel port but it is not released yet.

Just wondering if there is any common lore out there that I have missed on the subject,

Andy


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Stack trace for i386 yet?
      • From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
  • Next by Date: Why do static libraries require ranlib?
  • Previous by thread: Re: GDB screws up drawing behaviour under Guard Malloc
  • Next by thread: Re: Stack trace for i386 yet?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread