• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year


  • Subject: Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
  • From: Ruslan Zasukhin <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:25:10 +0300
  • Thread-topic: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year

On 7/18/06 12:08 PM, "Steve Baxter" <email@hidden> wrote:

> I can't make WWDC either unfortunately, but I would second the 64-bit
> support.
>
> My three would be:
>
> (1) We need a full 64-bit version of Mac OS where *all* parts of the
> system are 64-bit (including Carbon, OpenGL etc).  Without this,
> Apple cannot compete with Windows x64 (which is a full 64-bit OS as
> opposed to the half-baked "non-GUI" 64-bit support in Mac OS as it
> stands).  A clear direction on x64 support is needed too.
>
> (2) I would like the indexing in Xcode to work as well as it did in
> CW.  Xcode does not reliably seem to manage to index files that are
> in the C paths but not in the project - it really should.
>
> (3) Fix the "Find in files" in Xcode.  It needs to be as fast as CW.
> In fact, if they just took the CW dialog and replicated it, that
> would be great.
>
> (2) and (3) are the only features I miss in CW now - Xcode 2.3 works
> so well, these would make it perfect!

I miss much more things from CW !!

1) Ability to open virtual methods with the same name in the separate window
        this is reported to xcode team

2) ability to see in debug dynamic type of objects.
        this is reported to xcode team
        It seems they say it works for dlls also, but with some magic steps

3) we must avoid this "magic steps" !!

    it is too often xcode/gcc DEFAULT behavior is NOT expected natural
behavior. Few times I self have got in this traps already. To get DEFAULT
NATIRAL EXPECTED for C++ developer behavior you must use some secret/magic
linker or compiler switches.

4) ToolTips in debugger


5) Much more fast and smart intellesence.
        Visual Studio + third party plugin Visual Assist for Visual
        do great things in this regard.

        Also I like how REALbasic works. Fast and comfortable.

        In CW this was nightmare. Almost never work. Slow and Ugly.

        In xcode also I do not feel many help from this feature.


--
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
      • From: "Andy O'Meara" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year (From: Steve Baxter <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
  • Next by Date: Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
  • Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
  • Next by thread: Re: [ANN] Xcode + Leopard at WWDC this year
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread