Re: One byte bool
Re: One byte bool
- Subject: Re: One byte bool
- From: Thomas Engelmeier <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:52:30 +0100
Am 15.03.2006 um 13:16 schrieb Clark Cox:
On 3/15/06, Jerry <email@hidden> wrote:
On 14 Mar 2006, at 22:35, Ben wrote:
I've never understood why people prefer things like bool, int, or
long to the much safer types of unit8, int32, int64, and the like.
The problem I always find is that you have a fantastic choice between
uint8, uint8_t, UINT8, u_int8, UInt8, U8, guint8, jsuint8 or whatever
name the writers of the libraries
Well, my vote goes to uint8_t and friends, as those are part of the
C standard.
Those are part of the CURRENT C99 / C++1998 standards.
Most of the 3rd party code I see is not even compliant to these 7
year old standards.
BTW; I would go for the uint_leastXX_t for most variables where speed
and not an exact size is required...
Regards,
Tom_E
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden