Re: difference btw Xcode 1.5 and 2.x
Re: difference btw Xcode 1.5 and 2.x
- Subject: Re: difference btw Xcode 1.5 and 2.x
- From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:13:11 +0300
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Jan Calta wrote:
I've never write anything for MacOS so I'm going to buy old iMac to
learn it. I'm afraid it will run hardly Panther, not Tiger so I'd like
to know what are the biggest differences btw Xcode 1.5 (I hope this
will run on Panther) and Xcode 2.x (I've read this can be run on Tiger
only - is it true?)?
XCode 1.5 is able to build only PowerPC binaries, so you wont be able
to compile Universal Binaries which run natively on intel based macs.
Do I've access to whole Cocoa library via Xcode 1.5? And what is your
experience with performance of Xcode on slow old macs (mine is going
to be 400MHz G3, 384MB RAM)?
Cocoa is always accessible.
384 Mb would allow you to work, but you'd experiencing disk swapping.
Where was a period i did some development on iBook with 256 Mb RAM -
that was quite painful.
--
Sincerely,
Rustam Muginov
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden