• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk


  • Subject: Re: how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk
  • From: David Dunham <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:51:44 -0800


On 28 Mar 2006, at 18:38, Mark Sanvitale wrote:

It is very possible that my brain done broke and I am mixing things up (i.e. the separation by architecture that happens within the build results directory (e.g. i386 and ppc) has seeped into my thoughts of app packaging which has separation-by-platform (e.g. MacOS, MacOSClassic)).

I think you're confusing the MacOS/Mac OS Classic with universal binaries (which can contain more than two architectures -- ppc64 is another current possibility).
------------
David Dunham email@hidden http://www.pensee.com/dunham/
"No matter how far you have gone on a wrong road, turn back." - Turkish proverb


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk (From: Mark Sanvitale <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk
  • Next by Date: Re: how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk
  • Previous by thread: how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk
  • Next by thread: Re: how a universal package/bundle/binary looks on disk
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread