Re: Building universal binary of open source library
Re: Building universal binary of open source library
- Subject: Re: Building universal binary of open source library
- From: Michael Watson <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:39:23 -0500
We recommend this framework to our Sound Studio customers, and it's
performed very well. Totally recommended to anyone who wants UB MP3
encoding in an app they're building.
:-)
--
Michael
On 06 Mar, 2007, at 22:32, David Alger wrote:
A simple search turned up the link.
http://www.ktunes.net/downloads/LAME.zip
HTH,
David
On Mar 6, 2007, at 9:28 PM, David Alger wrote:
I found a universal build of LAME on the net that works great.
It's a framework bundle, so when locating the library you have to
delve into the bundle and choose the executable data file. At
least that's the way it is in Audacity.
If you don't actually want to modify it, you might try searching
the net first. I don't remember where I found it or I would post a
link to the site.
Regards,
David Alger
On Mar 6, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Mar 7, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Brant Sears wrote:
I did check the archives and this has been asked before, but I'd
like to ask for a clarification as I didn't completely
understand the issue after reading the archives.
I'm trying to compile LAME as a universal library.
Apparently it is set to use several -M switches: MT MD MP MF
which gcc tells me are incompatible with using -arch.
What do these switches do exactly that makes them not work with -
arch?
Automake/autoconf add these flags unless you pass --disable-
dependency-tracking to configure. You will need to be very
careful! http://lame.cvs.sourceforge.net/lame/lame/configure.in?
view=markup shows that lame's configure checks for sizeof() all
the standard types and endianness. It also enables bits and
pieces based on host_cpu. This is not a simple add some -arch
flags and go type build to get it universal.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40familyfriendlysoftware.com
This email sent to email@hidden
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<>Why are C string processing functions so ruthless? <>
<>Nothing at stop they because :rewsnA <>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40familyfriendlysoftware.com
This email sent to email@hidden
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<>Why are C string processing functions so ruthless? <>
<>Nothing at stop they because :rewsnA <>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40bungie.org
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden