Re: double compile messages
Re: double compile messages
- Subject: Re: double compile messages
- From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:00:35 -0800
On Nov 4, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:27:25 -0700, Shawn Erickson
<email@hidden> said:
On Oct 31, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Chris Neustrup wrote:
I've got 2 files as implementation sources. When I do the build
they are both compiled twice. I've checked the project preferences,
and nothing jumps out.
Once for Intel, once for PowerPC? (look for -arch in the build
transcript)
You building a Release build? If so that defaults to building a
universal binary.
But the thing is, a newly created project now defaults to being a
Release
build. Isn't that kind of odd? m.
Not really -- for a new project there are typically only a handful of
source files.
Defaulting to Release doesn't add *that* much time to compilation
(especially not for Cocoa apps -- ObjC compiles fast), doesn't impact
debugging *that* badly while the code is simple, and means that the
app is reasonably sized and "just works" when drag-n-dropped somewhere
else.
Defaulting to Debug has surprised many a developer when their app
didn't work anywhere but the products directory OR was considerably
larger than expected.
By the time someone has any complexity to their project, they have
probably had to adjust something build related and figured out that
there is a "release" vs. "debug" modality available.
b.bum
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden