Re: libPng is not univeral?
Re: libPng is not univeral?
- Subject: Re: libPng is not univeral?
- From: Peter O'Gorman <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:41:17 -0500
On Oct 29, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
On Oct 29, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
The /usr/local/lib in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk on my leopard
system is empty. Do you have a libPng.dylib in yours?
Actually, I'm even more puzzled as I look into this. My app
uses .png files, but it doesn't call libpng directly. It uses Carbon
and CG exclusively. Nano's libNano.a project does NOT link against
any libraries. My own app links against only the following Frameworks:
Accelerate
Carbon
Cocoa
QuickTime
Security
SystemConfiguration
WebKit
Unfortunately, I just don't know enough about Xcode/GCC to figure out:
a) why libpng is being pulled in
b) why I don't have a "proper" libpng (if it's really necessary).
Thanks for any help...
If you use a case sensitive filesystem, you will probably have fewer
issues with this. As far as ld and dyld are concerned libPng is the
same as libpng, so confusion will ensue.
Really, the ImageIO framework folks should have mangled the install
names of these popular dynamic libraries so that the linker and
dynamic linker would not get messed up on case insensitive file systems.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden