• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Came back to this mailing list.. continuation of Re: [Q] Is the 10.4u SDK distributed for the Intel Mac and the PPC Mac different?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Came back to this mailing list.. continuation of Re: [Q] Is the 10.4u SDK distributed for the Intel Mac and the PPC Mac different?


  • Subject: Came back to this mailing list.. continuation of Re: [Q] Is the 10.4u SDK distributed for the Intel Mac and the PPC Mac different?
  • From: JongAm Park <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:08:47 -0700

How are you doing, all?

Last weekend I compiled the troubled project at home, and thought about the Xcode environment.
As all of you in this mailing list know, the Xcode has a project setting and target setting, and they look the same.
I usually set settings for a project in the Project setting, and understand why there is the target setting which looks identical to the project setting. If people understand what it is, it becomes very powerful thing. You can put different source codes in a Xcode project, and add one set of files to a one target, and add another set of file to another target.
Or, even with same source code, you can set some settings differently for each of targets.


However, most people works with only one target in a project, and if they are new to the Xcode, they tend to be embarrassed by the two "identical" setting, and forget where they change some settings in.

Even worse...
The troubled project I mentioned in my previous post contains some interesting thing.
When you add a library or a framework to the "Linked Framework", the path to the library is added to the "Target setting", instead of "Project Setting", although you would usually set your own header search path in the Project setting.
Why isn't it added to the project setting? Isn't the Target setting for the case when you want to set something different or special for the specific target? I'm not saying that it should be prohibited to add custom Header path and Library path to the Target setting. It should be possible. However, the default behaviour is strange to me.
And.. I guess this made the previous colleague confused. He put additional settings to the Target setting and seems to forget about it. There were some settings which may not work if people moves some directory, etc.
I guess he tried modifying some settings there when he was just exposed to the Xcode, and once he got accustomed to the Xcode environment, he seemed just drag and drop libraries to link to the "Linked Framework", and usually care for the project setting.


The Xcode is very much streamlined compared to the Project Builder and earlier version of the Xcode.
I suggested simplifying the menu before throught the bugreport, and am glad to see that the Xcode 3.1 removed most of excessive menu items, and things are simple and more well organized now.
However, I think there are some area where it needs to be enhanced.


Can others also share their frustration in using the Xcode and provide some good ideas on how to improve the Xcode?
It can be quite a constructive discussion and fun.


Have a nice holiday~

JongAm Park.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Interesting preprocessor code behavior
  • Next by Date: IB: Inserting a parent item in a splitview pane?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Interesting preprocessor code behavior
  • Next by thread: IB: Inserting a parent item in a splitview pane?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread