• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions


  • Subject: Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions
  • From: "Clark Cox" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:04:14 -0700

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Jens Miltner <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Am 11.07.2008 um 14:45 schrieb Stéphane Sudre:
>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Ken Thomases wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Stéphane Sudre wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Mac OS X version 10.5 or later is needed for zerocost-exception"
>>>>
>>>> What is this sentence trying to say?
>>>
>>> I'm not entirely sure.  Are you trying to compile some Objective-C for
>>> 64-bit architecture but also specifying a deployment target of 10.4?
>>>
>>> Here's some background: With Leopard, Apple revamped the Objective-C ABI
>>> but only for 64-bit.  They couldn't do so for 32-bit because it would break
>>> binary compatibility.  In the 64-bit ABI, Objective-C exceptions were based
>>> on the same mechanisms as C++ exceptions, which makes them zero-cost unless
>>> an exception actually happens.
>>>
>>> That message seems to suggest you have asked the compiler to emit code
>>> relying on that ABI, but also said you may deploy it on a target not
>>> supporting that ABI.
>>
>>
>> It looks like it's what you're describing.
>>
>> Does this imply that you can not build a project easily on Xcode with
>> exceptions support as soon as you want to test a 32/64-bit Universal Binary
>> application that can run on Tiger and later?
>>
>> It sounds like it might be the return of the
>> "SDK_Deployment_ppc_32_or_something_like_this" options...
>
> I'd assume that there would be an option to specify the exception mechanism
> to use (i.e. allow for backward-compatible exception support in 64-bit
> binaries, too).

Backwards compatible with what? Before Leopard, one couldn't build
64-bit Objective-C binaries.


--
Clark S. Cox III
email@hidden
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions
      • From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>
    • Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions
      • From: Jens Miltner <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions (From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions (From: Ken Thomases <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions (From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions (From: Jens Miltner <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: getting files of current directory
  • Next by Date: Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions
  • Previous by thread: Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions
  • Next by thread: Re: Non human friendly error message from compiler with exceptions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread