Re: LLVM or GCC or Intel?
Re: LLVM or GCC or Intel?
- Subject: Re: LLVM or GCC or Intel?
- From: Bill Northcott <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:59:59 +1000
On 31/07/2008, at 2:51 AM, Todd wrote:
But what about LLVM? I have not heard of this much in the past (just
off and on) and now that it seems Apple is moving away from GCC in
favor of LLVM, what should developers do?
First the disclaimer: these thoughts owe nothing to any insider
knowledge or pre-released code, I just add up the observable facts and
come to the obvious conclusion.
Facts:
1. Apple is shovelling money into LLVM development.
2. Despite many versions of GCC beyond 4.2 having been released,
Apple uses no GCC code more recent than 4.2 in released products.
3. GCC versions more recent than 4.2 are licensed under GPL 3, which
prohibits DRM and closed devices like iPod or AppleTV, and would
appear to be totally incompatible with Apple's business model.
4. LLVM has totally permissive licensing. Allowing proprietary forks
and just about anything else.
Obvious conclusion:
Apple is ditching GCC because of the project's decision to go with GPL
3. The company has no choice in this.
So you better get used to LLVM or whatever pocket the roulette ball
lands in.
Cheers
Bill Northcott
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden