Re: Code Index with "*.hh" Files
Re: Code Index with "*.hh" Files
- Subject: Re: Code Index with "*.hh" Files
- From: "Colin A. Smith" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:08:55 -0800
- Thread-topic: Code Index with "*.hh" Files
On 3/1/08 19:41, "Bill Royds" <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks for the helpful comments. It turns out that the problem is
>> not with
>> the file extension, but the fact that all of the headers are
>> included using
>> <> instead of "". For instance:
>>
>> #include <TestClass.hh>
>
> But that means that Xcode is doing exactly what the C/C++ standard
> stays.
>
> Include files with <> are supposed to be system files and should not
> be indexed.
> I wouldn't all possible system headers to be included in any cross
> reference.
> What you need to do i change your source files to use the correct
> #include syntax.
>
> Bill Royds
I'm compiling/editing files from a large code-base that's actively developed
by many other developers. The coding standards are already firmly
established and unchangeable.
I certainly would not want Xcode to index system headers. However, I would
like to define a limited number of directories within my project that the
Xcode indexer will search when trying to resolve files included with the <>
syntax. It might slow indexing performance down slightly for my project.
However, it would not change existing indexing behavior or performance if
the list of search directories was empty by default.
-Colin
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden