Re: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0
Re: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0
- Subject: Re: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0
- From: William Squires <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:40:35 -0500
Okay, thanks.
On Mar 9, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Chris Espinosa wrote:
On Mar 9, 2008, at 1:03 PM, William Squires wrote:
Just a simple yes/no question here, so hopefully doesn't violate
NDA on iPhone stuff. I installed the "new" XCode 3.1 (yes, from
the iPhone dev URL), and the readme ("About iPhone SDK.pdf")
states that one should create a new folder, or it'll overwrite
XCode 3.0 if installed in /Developer.
But none of the sample projects compile as it can't find the
headers (like, maybe, the paths are supposed to point to /
Developer/???) from within the precompiled header in the sample
projects. So is it, "yes, XCode 3.1 is separate from XCode
3.0" (in which case the installer has a snafu), or "no, you're
supposed to use the package to UPDATE 3.0 -> 3.1"?
There's a known bug about some things failing if there's a space in
the install path.
As has been mentioned before, you can use xcode-
email@hidden for questions about products released
under nondisclosure.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden