Re: Xcode 3.0 and new SCM features
Re: Xcode 3.0 and new SCM features
- Subject: Re: Xcode 3.0 and new SCM features
- From: Andrew Pontious <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:01:29 -0800
On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:11 AM, Marc Stibane wrote:
Am 12.11.2008 um 17:41 schrieb David Dunham:
On 12 Nov 2008, at 05:09, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
Common, guys - haven't you ever seen a company with more than 10
developers?
I just recently started working for a company where there are
more than 100 co-workers.
They have a CVS (urgh, never change a running system, you know)
tree like this
Don't need everything ? do a sparse checkout. ( http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.advanced.sparsedirs.html
)
We inadvertently avoided the horrible problems with the new Xcode
behavior with new projects when we switched to using externals. Now
everything is in one source tree in the working directory (even if
it's scattered in the repository).
But neither of these solutions helps someone using CVS! (Let alone
us, still on Subversion 1.4.)
And I don't think sparse checkup helps someone who works on 10
different projects and has them all on their machine.
Exactly!
I don't want Windows and Linux IDE projects in my CVS tree, and they
don't want my Xcode projects.
Please, could all developers affected by this fatal behaviour of SCM
support in Xcode 3.x file a bug and suggest to get (as an option)
the old behaviour of Xcode 2.x back?
Just klick on http://bugreport.apple.com right now...
You can mark it as duplicate of rdar://6367479 (Xcode 3 SCM broken
(2.x was OK)), which I just filed.
This is a known issue. More bugs about this issue are not needed at
this time.
-- Andrew
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden