Re: Shark versus llvm-g++-4.2
Re: Shark versus llvm-g++-4.2
- Subject: Re: Shark versus llvm-g++-4.2
- From: Rick Altherr <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:18:19 -0700
On Oct 19, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Would it surprise anyone to hear that Shark couldn't symbolicate code
compiled by llvm-gcc-4.2?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
@apple.com
This email sent to email@hidden
Yes. Are you missing symbol names, source information, or both?
If symbol names, did you build with debug information? Are you
stripping the binary manually? Are you using STABs, DWARF, or DWARF
w/ dSYM?
If source information, does Shark prompt you to find the source or
not? If not, then Shark didn't find any source line information in
the debugging information. Are you building with DWARF or DWARF w/
dSYMs? Are you stripping the binary manually? If DWARF, are you
moving the .o's generated by the compiler?
--
Rick Altherr
Architecture and Performance Group
email@hidden
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden