• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: SPAM-HIGH: Re: OK on Windows C++
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SPAM-HIGH: Re: OK on Windows C++


  • Subject: Re: SPAM-HIGH: Re: OK on Windows C++
  • From: Sherm Pendley <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:10:49 -0500

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Clark Cox <email@hidden> wrote:

> Any C++ compiler that allows that is simply broken.

What? You mean Microsoft doesn't respect standards?!?!? I'm shocked!

sherm--

--
Cocoa programming in Perl:
http://www.camelbones.org
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: SPAM-HIGH: Re: OK on Windows C++ (From: "Paul Sanders" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SPAM-HIGH: Re: OK on Windows C++ (From: Clark Cox <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: how to use LLVM
  • Next by Date: Re: Xcode 3.2.1 is Available on Software Update
  • Previous by thread: Re: SPAM-HIGH: Re: OK on Windows C++
  • Next by thread: Framework with static instead of dynamic library?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread