• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?


  • Subject: Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?
  • From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:35:34 -0500
  • Organization: Rogue Research Inc.

On 12/15/09 7:31 PM, Richard Bannister said:

>> Umm, you only answered 1/3 of my question.  Anyway, switch to the 10.6
>> SDK and see if your errors go away, that worked in my situation.
>
>Oops, brain fart, sorry.
>
>GCC 4.2
>10.6 SDK
>i386 target (Active)
>
>With this combination I get a new link error:
>
>  "_vproc_transaction_begin", referenced from:
>      ___gcov_init in libgcov.a(_gcov.o)
>      _vproc_transaction_begin$non_lazy_ptr in libgcov.a(_gcov.o)
>
>  "_vproc_transaction_end", referenced from:
>      _gcov_exit in libgcov.a(_gcov.o)
>      _vproc_transaction_end$non_lazy_ptr in libgcov.a(_gcov.o)
>
>ld: symbol(s) not found
>
>Am I going insane?

No.

In my experience, code coverage is quite broken. :(

Try one more thing: switch to gcc 4.0.  Do the link errors go away?

--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng                 email@hidden
Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?
      • From: Richard Bannister <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Feedback-directed optimization broken? (From: Richard Bannister <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken? (From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken? (From: Richard Bannister <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken? (From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken? (From: Richard Bannister <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?
  • Next by Date: Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?
  • Next by thread: Re: Feedback-directed optimization broken?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread