Re: "Thinning out" fat libraries and frameworks
Re: "Thinning out" fat libraries and frameworks
- Subject: Re: "Thinning out" fat libraries and frameworks
- From: lbland <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:07:01 -0500
hi-
On Dec 16, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Rush Manbert wrote:
> Can I create separate ppc, x86, and x86_64 versions of the third party dylibs and frameworks by using lipo to extract just the architecture of interest
yes. Give it a spin.
And, as all old NeXTies know: You are not allowed to use the word "fat" as that implies bloated but also people are sensitive to their applications and frameworks being called fat. Such details were incessantly argued about years ago when fat was all the rage.
You must use "Universal" even though "Universal" on SN means x86 and x86_64 while on Leopard it means ppc, ppc64, x86 and x86_64, but we aren't allowed to mention the crazy uncle up in the attic that is depreciated let alone the fact that the universe is greater than Universal.
(just kidding around)...
thanks!-
-lance
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden