Re: Incomplete/incorrect dependency analysis after switching active architecture?
Re: Incomplete/incorrect dependency analysis after switching active architecture?
- Subject: Re: Incomplete/incorrect dependency analysis after switching active architecture?
- From: Jim Correia <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:52:01 -0400
On Mar 14, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Jim Correia wrote:
It turns out that there is nothing wrong with the dependency
analyzer (at least in this respect), and my project was set up
correctly.
The real problem is that codesign destroys the framework layout,
replacing the top level symlink with the another copy of the binary
during the signing process.
rdar://problem/6683283
Additional followup:
Code Signing In Depth says:
http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2007/tn2206.html#TNTAG13
$admin> # This is the wrong way:
$admin> codesign -s my-signing-identity ../FooBarBaz.framework
$admin> # This is the right way:
$admin> codesign -s my-signing-identity ../FooBarBaz.framework/
Versions/A
Xcode does it the wrong way:
CodeSign /Users/correia/tmp/build/Debug/MyFramework.framework
cd /Users/correia/Desktop/XcodeArchDependencyIssue/MyFramework
/usr/bin/codesign -f -s "My Identity" /Users/correia/tmp/build/Debug/
MyFramework.framework
/Users/correia/tmp/build/Debug/MyFramework.framework: replacing
existing signature
- Jim
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden