Re: Xcode 3.2 libtool, ld64
Re: Xcode 3.2 libtool, ld64
- Subject: Re: Xcode 3.2 libtool, ld64
- From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:38:36 +0200
Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, 04 Sep 2009:
I know that it's ugly, but, in my opinion, the most compatible way to do
this is for your compiler to call Apple's compiler for the link step,
not ld or libtool (I believe this is what icc does).
I've also thought about doing that, but "Apple's compiler" is
obviously sooner or later going to change from gcc into Clang, at
which point things would probably break down again. Maybe I should
just make the name of linker configurable.
Jonas
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden