Re: gcc 4.2 generates error that was OK before
Re: gcc 4.2 generates error that was OK before
- Subject: Re: gcc 4.2 generates error that was OK before
- From: Markian Hlynka <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:59:53 -0600
It may be that the compiler is for some reason treating your
function declaration as a declaration of a variable with an
initialiser and then barfing.
Inunderstand what you're saying, but how does c++ usually determine
the difference. I suspect this is part of it ni can't seem to remember
the proper syntax for prototypes wihout named vars. And, afai recall,
void foo(void) means there is no parameters. Why have you typedeffed
the existence of no parameters?
Now I really want to see the answer to this. Oh, and sorry for
referring to multiple "you"s in one email!
Markian
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden