Re: building for 10.5 vs 10.6
Re: building for 10.5 vs 10.6
- Subject: Re: building for 10.5 vs 10.6
- From: Matt Neuburg <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:39:24 -0700
- Thread-topic: building for 10.5 vs 10.6
On or about 6/29/10 8:16 AM, thus spake "Christiaan Hofman"
<email@hidden>:
>> conditionalized. Then change the base SDK back to 10.6 (or default) and build
>> for release (or for testing on a 10.5 machine, but now you shouldn't find any
>> backwards-compatibility problems there).
>>
>> Well, I was agreeing until that last sentence. Testing on 10.5 SDK on a 10.6
>> machine is *absolutely not* a substitute for testing on a machine that is
>> actually *running* 10.5. m.
>
> Uhm, doesn't that mean that you *do* agree with that last sentence? He *is*
> talking there about building with the 10.6 SDK and testing on a 10.5 machine.
And he is *saying*, about that, that "you shouldn't find any
backwards-compatibility problems there", which might give someone the very,
very false impression that this step might not be necessary. My post
attempts to forestall that impression. m.
--
matt neuburg, phd = email@hidden, http://www.tidbits.com/matt/
pantes anthropoi tou eidenai oregontai phusei
Among the 2007 MacTech Top 25, http://tinyurl.com/2rh4pf
AppleScript: the Definitive Guide, 2nd edition
http://www.tidbits.com/matt/default.html#applescriptthings
Take Control of Exploring & Customizing Snow Leopard
http://tinyurl.com/kufyy8
RubyFrontier! http://www.apeth.com/RubyFrontierDocs/default.html
TidBITS, Mac news and reviews since 1990, http://www.tidbits.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden