• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Building with 10.6 SDK vs libstdc++ on 10.5
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building with 10.6 SDK vs libstdc++ on 10.5


  • Subject: Re: Building with 10.6 SDK vs libstdc++ on 10.5
  • From: Fritz Anderson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:58:11 -0500

On 15 Mar 2010, at 10:09 AM, Matt Gough wrote:

> For now I am rolling back to the 10.5 SDK, since I've already spent enough time on this. If anyone else has any insight it would be much appreciated.

If you don't want, or as in your case you must avoid, features in the 10.6 SDK, you should not use it. Rolling back to an earlier SDK is a perfectly acceptable strategy.

It sounds as though your code and library base is interdependent enough that the usual strategy, of weak-linking against the latest SDK, and working around when you find null symbols, won't work for you. It sounds as though you're relying on libraries that don't do weak-link checking.

	— F

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Building with 10.6 SDK vs libstdc++ on 10.5 (From: Matt Gough <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Building with 10.6 SDK vs libstdc++ on 10.5
  • Next by Date: Analyze project to find missing or unreferenced files
  • Previous by thread: Building with 10.6 SDK vs libstdc++ on 10.5
  • Next by thread: Analyze project to find missing or unreferenced files
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread