Re: Static analyser less rigorous nowadays?
Re: Static analyser less rigorous nowadays?
- Subject: Re: Static analyser less rigorous nowadays?
- From: steven hooley <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:12:29 +0000
- Importance: Normal
eek! Just to clarify, that isn't real code. The actual case was more subtle, but on investigation I was surprised that nothing i could do could provoke the Static Analyser when a method argument was involved. I can sort of understand why this has to be.. but would be interested if anyone has any thoughts. Martin Wierschin wrote: > It does seem like the static analyzer should have given you warnings for > that mess. It certainly would be best if it did!
> On 2011.12.09, at 3:57 AM, steven hooley wrote:
>> - (void)foo:(NSString *)bar {
>> [bar release];
>> [bar release];
>> [bar release];
>> [bar release];
>> id boo = bar;
>> [boo release];
>> [boo release];
>> [boo release];
>> [boo release];
>> }
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden