• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support


  • Subject: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:29:18 +0100

Le 24 févr. 2012 à 20:03, Brad Oliver a écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> As part of our migration to Clang, I'm curious what the state of llvm-gcc is in terms of bugfixes and support.
>
> For example, has llvm-gcc seen any love between Xcode 4.0 and Xcode 4.3 or is it basically frozen in time from a few years ago? Doing a llvm-gcc -v, I see this:
>
> Xcode 4.3: LLVM build 2336.1.00
>
> Xcode 4.0.2 under 10.6.8: LLVM build 2335.9
>
> That's not a huge difference. I realize Clang is the One True Way, so my curiosity is mainly about coping with codegen bugs that we've hit in llvm-gcc and planning a way around that.
>
> If the answer is "llvm-gcc will not see fixes and has not since Xcode 4.0; forge ahead with Clang", then that's good enough.


llvm-gcc is obsolete and has been deprecated in the LLVM 3.0 release (using the official LLVM versioning, not the fancy Apple one).

It is not longer supported, and cannot be compiled using recent LLVM versions. So except if Apple keep a private branch, don't expect any change.


-- Jean-Daniel





 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
      • From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>
References: 
 >"Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: How to do Intel style inline assembly with LLVM 3.0?
  • Next by Date: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • Previous by thread: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • Next by thread: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread