• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++


  • Subject: Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++
  • From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:30:43 -0700

Given that the modern type is _Bool, and that's defined by the compiler (it's not typedefed to int, for example), then it seems to me that @true should create a CFBoolean in C99. If others agree, I'll write a bug for this, too.

On Jul 9, 2013, at 13:25 , Scott Ribe <email@hidden> wrote:

> On Jul 9, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Scott Ribe <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see what @true/@false have to do with true/false.
>>
>> @true is a shortcut for @(true), so the compiler first evaluates ‘true’ and then boxes the result.
>
> OK, true. (haha)
>
>> I think the issue is that the auto-boxing code has a special case for the Obj-C YES/NO constants that outputs boolean-type NSNumbers instead of 0/1, but it doesn’t have the same special case for the C99 ‘bool’ type.
>
> Yes, that seems like a bug. I don't see any reason why boxing of true/false should necessitate creating a boxed int.
>
>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 02:48 , Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> No, unless you redefine the true and false macros.
>>> The C standard specifies that true and false are macro that expand to integer constant with value 1 and 0 respectively.
>>
>> In C99 ‘true’ and ‘false’ are builtin constants of type ‘bool’, not macros. (Right? IANALL.)
>
> Well, technically, to be most flexible wrt to backwards compatbility, etc, bool is a macro (or typedef???) for _Bool, and true/false are macros, and there's a __bool_true_false_are_defined that allows you to write your own header to allow for code that is compatible with both C99 and older compilers. If you really care, open <stdbool.h>
>
> --
> Scott Ribe
> email@hidden
> http://www.elevated-dev.com/
> (303) 722-0567 voice
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


--
Rick




 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++ (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++ (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++ (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++ (From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++ (From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++ (From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Launch Services Issue/Question - two apps using same file extensions
  • Next by Date: Re: Launch Services Issue/Question - two apps using same file extensions
  • Previous by thread: Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++
  • Next by thread: Re: Type of @true in Obj-C vs Obj-C++
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread