Re: Xc6 won’t archive standalone OS X frameworks?
Re: Xc6 won’t archive standalone OS X frameworks?
- Subject: Re: Xc6 won’t archive standalone OS X frameworks?
- From: Seth Willits <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:31:09 -0800
On Nov 21, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Quincey Morris <email@hidden> wrote:
> I presume the default “Skip Install” for a framework is YES because that’s what you want when you’re making a private embedded framework, which is perhaps the usual case these days.
>
> So, factoring out Xcodes’s terminological, functional and configurational weirdnesses, it seems to be working for me.
The other thing "install" affects is if you bundle that framework with an app. By having "install" turned on, that framework will now be a built product that's included in the application's archive, which then makes Xcode not recognize the archive as simply being an "application archive", so it gets kind of messy.
--
Seth Willits
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden