• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)


  • Subject: Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
  • From: garbanzito <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 20:04:02 -0700

at 2002 03 23, 17:43 -0800, they whom i call John W Baxter wrote:
Classic will eventually go away. The big knock against UFS is that Classic
apps can't access such volumes. Once Classic isn't an issue, UFS will
become more popular.

UFS has a few more knocks against it than that! one would
hope Apple could come up with something better than either
UFS or HFS+. both have room for improvement and switching is
not very compelling unless one is "moving up".

--
steve harley email@hidden
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >[OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id) (From: JollyRoger <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id) (From: John W Baxter <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
  • Next by Date: Re: Milliseconds in OS X?
  • Previous by thread: Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
  • Next by thread: Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread