Re: Interpretation of static types in Cocoa [Was: Immutable discomfort]
Re: Interpretation of static types in Cocoa [Was: Immutable discomfort]
- Subject: Re: Interpretation of static types in Cocoa [Was: Immutable discomfort]
- From: Dustin Voss <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:17:55 -0800
On 19 Dec, 2005, at 9:31 AM, Stephane Sudre wrote:
Could it be possible to have a 2 sentences summary with an example?
On Friday, December 19, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Philippe Mougin wrote:
----- quote ----
"In Cocoa, the types declared for arguments and return values in the
API are more about what the caller can do with the return value or
what the method will do with the argument rather than what the return
value really will be or what the argument must be."
------------------
[...]
Heh. The five-second attention span strikes again.
Since Philippe was replying "in the spirit of good technical debate"
and not "in the spirit of summarizing a foregone conclusion", I'd
hazard a guess that the answer to your (and my, if truth be told)
plaintive request would be "No."
Just remember to take it one sentence at a time, with stretch breaks
and eye exercises as appropriate. And remember to stay hydrated. :)
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.