Re: Archiving performance (was: Re: (no subject))
Re: Archiving performance (was: Re: (no subject))
- Subject: Re: Archiving performance (was: Re: (no subject))
- From: Ambroise Confetti <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 04:08:31 +0100
Le 8 nov. 03, ` 15:46, Alastair Houghton a icrit :
>
Try this thread:
>
>
http://cocoa.mamasam.com/MACOSXDEV/2003/09/1/72187.php
>
>
(The keywords I used in my search were "keyed", "archive" and
>
"performance", and this thread was the second one in the list.)
I had seen this one... What is substantially being said is that a way
to encode things fast is to not use keyed archiving.
This is not very encouraging... The object graph I have to encode is
quite complex. I think I will continue to use sequential archiving but
by archiving one NSDictionary object per class in order to simulate
keyed archiving (or maybe make my own keyed archiver as an NSArchiver
subclass by using this technique).
What I don't understand is why sequential archiving is so much slower
with NSKeyedArchiver than with NSArchiver. A great step backward?
Ambroise
http://www.cellulo.info/
ICQ 4508259
AIM atvaark
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/directory which had a name of Ambroise Confetti.vcf]
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.