Re: Archiving's Future?
Re: Archiving's Future?
- Subject: Re: Archiving's Future?
- From: Ali Ozer <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 09:16:22 -0700
Several optimizations were made in Tiger; if you're still seeing
issues in your usage, please submit bugs (or refresh previously
submitted bugs...). However note that as with archiving, keyed
archiving is currently a write all/read all solution, meaning it's
not appropriate for very large files. Switching from XML format keyed
archives to binary format keyed archives provides significant
improvement, but it's still not an incremental format at this point.
Hence what I meant by "this context."
CoreData with SQL files is much more appropriate for potentially
large files that need to be read/written incrementally.
Ali
Begin forwarded message:
From: Georg Tuparev <email@hidden>
Date: May 1, 2005 2:05:17 PDT
To: Ali Ozer <email@hidden>
Cc: Cocoa List <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: Archiving's Future?
In this context, when will be keyed archive reasonably fast?
gt
On May 1, 2005, at 6:05 AM, Ali Ozer wrote:
In this context, keyed archiving.
Ali
Begin forwarded message:
From: Greg <email@hidden>
Date: April 30, 2005 20:19:55 PDT
To: email@hidden
Subject: Archiving's Future?
I just read through the foundation release notes and saw at the
bottom about API deprecations:
"The NSArchiver and NSUnarchiver classes and other APIs in
NSArchiver.h are not deprecated in this release, but may be in
the next release."
I would just like to know, what the migration path is recommended
by apple? keyed archiving? core data?
Greg
Georg Tuparev
Tuparev Technologies
Klipper 13
1186 VR Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31-6-55798196
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden