Re: property name-to-accessor munging? (was: Dot Syntax docs missing?)
Re: property name-to-accessor munging? (was: Dot Syntax docs missing?)
- Subject: Re: property name-to-accessor munging? (was: Dot Syntax docs missing?)
- From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:17:41 +0200
Le 20 juil. 08 à 10:33, Ken Thomases a écrit :
On Jul 18, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
I realize after all this, it's not really the Dot Syntax I need. I
need to know how a property name (starts with lower-case letter) is
transliterated into the getter/setter names.
The dot syntax uses the getter and setting specified for the
property in the @property declaration. As documented[1], if you
don't explicitly supply getter or setter names in that directive, it
defaults to the property name for the getter and "set" plus the
property name with its first letter capitalized plus a trailing
colon for the setter.
It also has a special case for boolean where getter may be prefixed by
"is": enabled => isEnabled / setEnabled:.
The naming conventions[2] used in Cocoa predate both Key-Value
Coding[3] and the dot syntax, and therefore both follow them.
Cheers,
Ken
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden