Re: property name-to-accessor munging? (was: Dot Syntax docs missing?)
Re: property name-to-accessor munging? (was: Dot Syntax docs missing?)
- Subject: Re: property name-to-accessor munging? (was: Dot Syntax docs missing?)
- From: mmalc crawford <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:27:15 -0700
On Jul 20, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
The dot syntax uses the getter and setting specified for the
property in the @property declaration. As documented[1], if you
don't explicitly supply getter or setter names in that directive,
it defaults to the property name for the getter and "set" plus the
property name with its first letter capitalized plus a trailing
colon for the setter.
It also has a special case for boolean where getter may be prefixed
by "is": enabled => isEnabled / setEnabled:.
For dot syntax, no it doesn't.
If you want to use isEnabled, you must specify it in the property
declaration.
mmalc
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden