RE: working with sixteen bit scans
RE: working with sixteen bit scans
- Subject: RE: working with sixteen bit scans
- From: "michael shaffer" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:50:04 -0330
Andrew writes ...
>
on 3/11/02 11:50 PM, Richard Millott at email@hidden wrote:
>
>
>> should I use Perceptual or realative intent
>
>
>
> Try both and test for yourself, but Relative should work OK.
>
> ...
>
You can try both intents but I'll bet you, you get Relative Colorimetric
>
either way. And I don't think BPC will play a factor.
Wouldn't the choice "percep" vs "relcol" come into consideration ^only^ if
converting from a larger gamut to a smaller. That is, it seems to me the
difference is supposed to be with how either will convert what is "out of
gamut"(?)
cheerios ... shAf :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland
www.micro-investigations.com (in progress)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.