RE: LAB's not a good colour space
RE: LAB's not a good colour space
- Subject: RE: LAB's not a good colour space
- From: "michael shaffer" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:32:16 -0330
Henrik writes ...
>
... that Adobe RGB (1998) does not support pure ink tank Y 100%
>
in ISO 12647-2 paper type 1 for glossy offset. ...
>
This is why eciRGB10 was developed by Karl Koch and why
>
NewColor 7000 ships with both Adobe RGB (1998) and eciRGB10 as
>
default RGB spaces, ...
You say eciRGB10 was "developed", when it appears Mr Koch threw all color
references into the air, and '1.8', 'D50' and "NTSC" landed in the hat(?) I
imagine more effort went into its development than that, but imagine where
my confidence in your statement went when I inspected its definitions.
Would someone justify to me how "NTSC" primaries can work so well in the
context of CMYK? Are you suggesting this RGB space as a working space for
color and tonal adjustments?
cheerios ... shAf :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland
www.micro-investigations.com (in progress)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.