Re: dE(2000)
Re: dE(2000)
- Subject: Re: dE(2000)
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:49:04 -0500
> What's
> the sense out there as to 2000 vs 1974 dE? My assumption is that while
> still not perfect, 2000 is still an improvement on 1974.
>
> Steve
Do you mean "1994"?
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >dE(2000) (From: Steve Kale <email@hidden>) |