Re: dE(2000)
Re: dE(2000)
- Subject: Re: dE(2000)
- From: Steve Kale <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:27:32 +0000
- Thread-topic: dE(2000)
Sorry - I mistyped. Yes I meant 2000 vs 1994.
> From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:49:04 -0500
> To: Steve Kale <email@hidden>, ColorSync
> <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: dE(2000)
>
>> What's
>> the sense out there as to 2000 vs 1974 dE? My assumption is that while
>> still not perfect, 2000 is still an improvement on 1974.
>>
>> Steve
>
> Do you mean "1994"?
>
> Roger Breton
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Re: dE(2000) (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>) |