• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]


  • Subject: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:42:49 +0000

On 28 Nov 2007, at 01:13, Andrew Rodney wrote:

On 11/27/07 5:57 PM, "Martin Orpen"  wrote:

Is it just me - or does anybody else think that the Eye One Pro is a
disaster for monitor calibration?

A Spectrophotometer isn't ideal for display calibration in handling dark
measurements but much better than a colorimeter with filters assuming an
sRGB behavior on a wider gamut device.

So I wasn't imaging the problems then - the Eye One Pro isn't good for shadows :-(



Cheaper devices do a much better job - DTP94 is (was) my particular
favourite.

In the cases you site, yes, it will be superior. But if you use it on a wide
gamut display, you'll encounter errors in white point measurements (I think
Karl Lang calculated a 500K 'error' with a Colorimeter on the 2690 over what
it should be, based on a $20K Spectroradiometer).

Karl would need to convince me that that presents more of a problem than shadow mush for day to day retouching work on my wide gamut display.


PS. Who cares if a monitor matches 96% of AdobeRGB anyhow? What kind
of "standard" is AdobeRGB - the *standard* for lazy Photoshop users
who don't know any better? That figure is as useful as the scanner
manufacturers DMAX values...

Like everything else, it has advantages and disadvantages. If you're working
with imagery that largely falls close to sRGB, its actually going to be a
disadvantage. If you're working with very saturated imagery, its useful
since you can now view colors outside sRGB.


As for a standard, who ever said it was a standard?

Well, if it's NOT a standard - why are these manufacturers falling over themselves to match it?


I'm working with imagery that falls outside of AdobeRGB - as is anybody who works with decent scanning equipment (or pro digital cameras). I'd rather the monitor manufactures made an effort to match the blues that we get from scanned transparency rather than the weird green of AdobeRGB. Or even made more of an effort to match process cyan :(

--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView] (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • Next by Date: Re[2]: Eizo CG241W vs. NEC 2690 SpectraView
  • Previous by thread: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • Next by thread: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread