Re: Printing Targets
Re: Printing Targets
- Subject: Re: Printing Targets
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:46:46 -0700
On Jan 16, 2010, at 8:28 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
> The fact that we are having this conversation about Aperture is doubly
> sad. The print group at Apple has lost it, and so has the Aperture
> group. And the Aperture group at the outset *pretended* they were not
> consumer focused.
Just how many of these customers need to print a stinkin untagged document? Lets not pretend that everyone other than a few color geeks have such a need and worse, saying both groups are not customer focused because if this, is disingenuous and inaccurate.
I don’t suppose the vendors who require the printing of untagged targets to build profiles in THEIR applications would deserve any of this responsibility? No, of course not, its the big kids who should be doing this (despite the number of users who would be burned printing this way).
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/ _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden