• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 14:33:16 -0800

One license per machine is how they have always done it.  I can't see SSDD
changing this. I don't know if you are actually required to use them, but
you do need to buy them.


Chuck


At 04:23 PM 04/03/2004 -0500, Andy Satori wrote:
>Ok, I've got my simple WebObjects application written and I'm happy
>with it.  I've done all my local testing, and I'm happy with
>everything.  Now I'm getting ready to deploy it.
>
>I've got the luxury of having a Cisco Content Switch to manage my load
>balancing between a couple of application servers, so I would like to
>deploy this to my two Sun Fire 100's running Apache and Tomcat, which I
>prefer to Sun's Application Server.  I've gotten the application
>deployed to both and it works flawlessly, however I currently have one
>of the boxes turned off because I still can't figure out the answer to
>one simple question, and the license is vague regarding this.
>
>It's clear that you have a Dev and Dep license in each box.  The
>deployment licensing when used with teh Apple WO Application Server is
>crystal clear.  I need another WO Retail box.
>
>But...
>
>With a single directory deployment, your license is tied to the war,
>and there is no Application Server installation and license.  This
>would imply that the license is a run-time license tied to the
>application, not the application server.  I can't find anything in the
>license that implicitly discusses the situation regarding the SSDD
>deployment options.
>
>What I infer currently is that either, A, the intent of the SSDD
>deployment is that it can be deployed without the WO license and is
>tied to the Development kit (much like the MS ASP.NET run-time license
>is tied to the compiler, not the host), or B, the intent is that you
>rebuild the app with a new Deployment license for each and every
>licensed deployment.
>
>I'd like to hear from the community how you understand and read this,
>because candidly, I'm confused.
>
>Andy
>_______________________________________________
>webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>
>

--

Chuck Hill                                 email@hidden
Global Village Consulting Inc.             http://www.global-village.net
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment (From: Andy Satori <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Next by Date: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Previous by thread: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread