• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • From: Daryl Lee <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:36:17 -0800

Andy,

Double check that these options are correctly set  in your main project
target.

SERVLET_DEPLOY_LICENSE = <your deployment license>
SERVLET_SINGLE_DIR_DEPLOY = YES

On Mar 4, 2004, at 1:23 PM, Andy Satori wrote:

> Ok, I've got my simple WebObjects application written and I'm happy
> with it.  I've done all my local testing, and I'm happy with
> everything.  Now I'm getting ready to deploy it.
>
> I've got the luxury of having a Cisco Content Switch to manage my load
> balancing between a couple of application servers, so I would like to
> deploy this to my two Sun Fire 100's running Apache and Tomcat, which
> I prefer to Sun's Application Server.  I've gotten the application
> deployed to both and it works flawlessly, however I currently have one
> of the boxes turned off because I still can't figure out the answer to
> one simple question, and the license is vague regarding this.
>
> It's clear that you have a Dev and Dep license in each box.  The
> deployment licensing when used with teh Apple WO Application Server is
> crystal clear.  I need another WO Retail box.
>
> But...
>
> With a single directory deployment, your license is tied to the war,
> and there is no Application Server installation and license.  This
> would imply that the license is a run-time license tied to the
> application, not the application server.  I can't find anything in the
> license that implicitly discusses the situation regarding the SSDD
> deployment options.
>
> What I infer currently is that either, A, the intent of the SSDD
> deployment is that it can be deployed without the WO license and is
> tied to the Development kit (much like the MS ASP.NET run-time license
> is tied to the compiler, not the host), or B, the intent is that you
> rebuild the app with a new Deployment license for each and every
> licensed deployment.
>
> I'd like to hear from the community how you understand and read this,
> because candidly, I'm confused.
>
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
      • From: Andy Satori <email@hidden>
References: 
 >WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment (From: Andy Satori <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Next by Date: Re: refreshes refetched objects: effects on performance?
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects Single Directory / Tomcat deployment
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread