• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?


  • Subject: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
  • From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:26:32 +1100

Hi Robert,

On 16/11/2005, at 5:52 AM, Robert Walker wrote:

Has anyone else noticed this:

In Xcode 2.2 the top panel shows only:

cannot resolve symbol

The detailed build log show this:

Classes/Session.java:31: cannot resolve symbol
symbol  : class NSMutablArray

Note: I basically forced this error to show as an example. Obviously NSMutablArray is incorrect.

This bug greatly reduces the usefulness of the build "overview" panel, as well as the "Errors and Warnings" smart group.

I'll be happy to create a bug report if nobody else has done so already.

I have done so yesterday. This is a bad change and I cannot imagine why it was approved...


All I get is:
"Command /Developer/Private/jam failed with exit code 1"

...and as noted above the smart group is now useless. You can still see the errors via the Build Results window but the other stuff shouldn't have gone away.

Problem id: 4343276
"Please bring back the Build Results Errors for Default Layout!"

I've submitted 4 other bug reports (most of which are for WebObjects Builder)...

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
      • From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>
    • Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
      • From: Clark Mueller <email@hidden>
References: 
 >So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: email@hidden)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Pierre Frisch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Pierre Frisch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: WebObjects 5.3.1 Redirect bug?
  • Next by Date: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
  • Previous by thread: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
  • Next by thread: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread