• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?


  • Subject: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
  • From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:05:56 -0500

Lachlan,

Cool thanks for the info and for submitting the bug. I hope this is a quick fix and we see an Xcode 2.2.1 soon.

On Nov 15, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:

Hi Robert,

On 16/11/2005, at 5:52 AM, Robert Walker wrote:

Has anyone else noticed this:

In Xcode 2.2 the top panel shows only:

cannot resolve symbol

The detailed build log show this:

Classes/Session.java:31: cannot resolve symbol
symbol  : class NSMutablArray

Note: I basically forced this error to show as an example. Obviously NSMutablArray is incorrect.

This bug greatly reduces the usefulness of the build "overview" panel, as well as the "Errors and Warnings" smart group.

I'll be happy to create a bug report if nobody else has done so already.

I have done so yesterday. This is a bad change and I cannot imagine why it was approved...


All I get is:
"Command /Developer/Private/jam failed with exit code 1"

...and as noted above the smart group is now useless. You can still see the errors via the Build Results window but the other stuff shouldn't have gone away.

Problem id: 4343276
"Please bring back the Build Results Errors for Default Layout!"

I've submitted 4 other bug reports (most of which are for WebObjects Builder)...

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck



_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
      • From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
References: 
 >So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: email@hidden)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Pierre Frisch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Pierre Frisch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>)
 >Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? - timing issue with file system?
  • Next by Date: smarter fetch limits
  • Previous by thread: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking? - timing issue with file system?
  • Next by thread: Re: So how is 5.3.1 looking?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread