Re: Apple's Support of WebObjects
Re: Apple's Support of WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Apple's Support of WebObjects
- From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:27:12 +0200
This IDE kinds of remind me everyday that I don't really master it.
And I don't like the way it tends to fill up the screen, or the way
it pretends to show everything simultaneously by adding views all
around.
May be the default WOLips perspective should only have 2 or 3 views
(package explorer–or how is it called?–, editor, console/problems)?
When I open NetBeans for example, I always think "what a
nicer UI". Maybe because it is more colorful? With bigger icons? But
this is more an overall feeling, and I think WOLips developers can do
a lot about it.
Sorry I meant "I think WOLips developers CANNOT do a lot about it".
The biggest problem with WOLips is the "dual" compiler. One should
not have to fiddle with ant tasks to do WebObjects development, i
think.
I did not want to scare users who want to switch to Eclipse/WOLips.
In fact, just doing WO development, fiddling with ant task never
happens, as you always use the incremental compiler.
To deploy, you must use ant. Both compiler have similar result, and
generally, you don't see any difference between then.
But some issues can arise because both compilers do not have the same
policy with respect to flattening of resources.
And recently, some glitches showed up with localized resources in
rapid turnaround mode in frameworks.
But these are really minor issues.
JPM _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden