Re: Intel inline assembly
Re: Intel inline assembly
- Subject: Re: Intel inline assembly
- From: Sebastien Metrot <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:58:37 +0200
Done: radar://4145839
I'll try the archi specific flags tomorow!
many thanks
Sebastien
Scott Tooker wrote:
Please file an enhancement request at bugreporter.apple.com.
Scott
On Jun 10, 2005, at 6:50 AM, Sebastien Metrot wrote:
Hi,
We currently build our applications both on MSVC 7.1 and XCode. The
MacIntel switch will permit us to reuse a lot of our low level
optims for x86. The PPC targets use -fasm-blocks for out PPC inline
assembly, to match the codewarrior syntax. I know gcc can use the
standard intel syntax with -masm=intel but it would still need a lot
of source code reformating as this syntax requires each line of code
to be enclosed in double quotes. Is there an alternative solution
that would permit the use of inline assembly as easily as in
codewarrior and VC for intel? It would be nice if -fasm-blocks could
do the with VC syntax that it does for the codewarrior syntax.
I tried to add -masm=intel to our XCode project after enabling PPC
and Intel architectures but of course the PPC compilation generates
an error as it doesn't know about this flag. Is there a way to tell
xcode to use a particular option on one architechture and not the
other?
Thanks a lot in advances!
Sebastien
--
Sebastien Metrot
Lead Dev.
http://www.usbsounds.com
_
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden