Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj

Subject: Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
From: Brian Krent <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:17:27 -0400

OTOH, the user experience with names like English.lproj is better. Just use Get Info in Finder to look at some Apple application's languages list (or modify it) - it's a real mess of unintelligible two-letter codes.

I agree. The abbreviation/"letter-codes" are ugly to look at. It's unnatural and disgusts me. At the very least, end users should never have to see it. But I'd rather not have the .lproj bundles named with the abbreviations either. It may be a standard, but it's not a very good standard for a humane operating environment. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden Follow-Ups: Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj From: Greg Hurrell <email@hidden> References: >Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: João Varela <email@hidden>) >Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: Scott Tooker <email@hidden>) >Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: "Alexey Proskuryakov" <email@hidden>) Prev by Date: Re: breakpoints & line-endings Next by Date: problem during link of bundles Previous by thread: Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj Next by thread: Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj Index(es): Date Thread