Re: .lproj directory naming
Re: .lproj directory naming
- Subject: Re: .lproj directory naming
- From: "John C. Daub" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:50:27 -0600
- Thread-topic: .lproj directory naming
on 2/14/07 9:47 AM, Steve Christensen at email@hidden wrote:
> For now I plan to use the legacy designations. I was just wondering
> when support for the ISO 639 designations started being recognized.
I'm not sure exactly when ISO 639 came into play, but I'm pretty sure that
Mac OS X 10.3 supported them. I do believe the old legacy language names
have been depreciated for quite some time (maybe even back to 10.0, and thus
ISO 639 worked then) and you really shouldn't use them.
Bottom line: you really should use ISO 639 (or better, consider BCP 47)
unless you've got a good reason not to. Since you're going to be testing on
10.3 anyway, there's little reason to not just go with ISO 639 from the get
go.
--
John C. Daub }:-)>=
<mailto:email@hidden> <http://www.hsoi.com/>
"We will make everything metal; blacker than the blackest black... times
infinity!" - Nathan Explosion
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden